「41  特論」カテゴリーアーカイブ

文献:戦争責任・戦後補償

文献:戦争責任・戦後補償<作成中

720

発行
年月日
書名 編著者 発行所
1960
0210 戦争責任 竹内好・吉本隆明・村上一郎・竹内実・橋川文三 春秋社
1965
1212 南京作戦の真相 熊本第6師団戦記 下野一霍 東京情報社
1967
0320 三千人の生体実験 島村喬 原書房
1972
0720 中国の日本軍 本多勝一 創樹社
1973 「南京大虐殺」のまぼろし 鈴木明 文芸春秋
1975
0815 天皇の戦争責任 井上清 現代評論社
1115 戦争責任論序説 大沼保昭 東京大学出版会
1977
0301 現代史におけるアジア-帝国主義と日本の戦争責任 荒井信一 青木書店
 0815  あるB・C級戦犯の戦後史-ほんとうの戦争責任とは何か  富永正三  水曜社
1981
1010 新聞の犯した戦争責任 池田一之 経済往来社
1982
0325 中国の旅 本多勝一 朝日新聞社
0815 反核と戦争責任-「被害者」日本と「加害者」日本 岩松繁俊 三一書房
1231 決定版 南京大虐殺 洞富雄 現代史出版会(発売:徳間書店)
1983
0815 日の丸は赤い泪に―第731部隊員告白記 越定男 教育資料出版会
1984
0801 証言・南京大虐殺 戦争とはなにか 南京市文史史資料研究会、加々美光行・姫田光義訳 青木書店
1985
0530 東京裁判から戦後責任の思想へ 大沼保昭 有信堂
0719 戦争責任 家永三郎 岩波書店
1986
0102 天皇の軍隊と南京事件―もうひとつの日中戦争史 吉田裕 青木書店
0305 南京大虐殺の証明 洞富雄 朝日新聞社
0315 反核と日本の戦争責任-1985・12・7シンポジウム記録集 反核100000人委員会
0801 南京の日本軍―南京大虐殺とその拝啓 藤原彰 大月書店
0820 聞け!血涙の叫び 旧台湾出身日本兵秘録 基佐江里編著
 旧日本軍人軍属遺族救助基金会 支援委員会出版局
1987
0120 南京への道 本多勝一 朝日新聞社
 0820  南京事件を考える  洞富雄・藤原彰・本多勝一編  大月書店
1989
0415 民衆の戦争責任 高橋彦博 青木書店
0515 長崎市長への七三〇〇通の手紙-天皇の戦争責任をめぐって 径書房編 径書房
0720 戦争責任を訴えるひとり旅-ロンドン・ベルリン・ニューヨーク 富山妙子 岩波書店
1990
0415
0701 現代史における戦争責任-現代史シンポジウム 藤原彰・荒井信一編 青木書店
 1205  日系アメリカ人-強制収容から戦後補償へ  岡部一明  岩波書店
 1991
0715 日中戦争いまだ終らず―マレー「虐殺」の謎 中島みち 文芸春秋
 1225  キリスト者の戦争責任と平和運動  キリスト者平和の会編  かもがわ出版
 1992
0720 朝鮮植民地支配と戦後補償 戦後補償問題連絡委員会編 岩波書店
0725 戦後補償を考える-アジアの声第6集 国際フォーラム実行委員会編 東方出版
0921 南京大虐殺 日本人への告発 南京大虐殺の真相を明らかにする全国連絡会編 東方出版
1993
0601 憲法Bunko―平和・戦争責任・戦時補償 平和のための大阪の戦争展実行委員会;日本機関紙協会大阪府本部共編 日本機関紙出版センター
0720 浄土真宗の戦争責任 菱木政晴 岩波書店
0728 戦争責任の受けとめかた-ドイツと日本 加藤周一 アドバンテージサーバー
1122 連合国捕虜虐待と戦争責任 油井大三郎・小菅信子 岩波ブックレットNo.321
1994
0310 戦後世代の戦争責任 加藤周一 かもがわ出版
0531 泰緬鉄道と日本の戦争責任 捕虜とロームシャと朝鮮人と G・マコーマック著・内海愛子編 明石書店
0730 日本の戦後補償 日本弁護士連合会編 明石書店
0815 宗教者の戦争責任懺悔・告白資料集 日本宗教者平和協議会 白石書店
0915 ハンドブック戦後補償(増補版) 内海愛子・越田綾・田中宏・飛田雄一(監修) 梨の木舎
1225 戦争責任と戦後責任-祖父の罪を孫が償うのか 望田幸男 かもがわ出版
**** 南京大虐殺 徐志耕(秋子訳) 外文出版社(中国・北京)
1995
0315 50年目の戦争責任 破防法研究会 星雲社
0420 もう待てない今こそ戦後補償を! 高木健一 凱風社
0620 キーワード・日本の戦争犯罪 小田部雄次・林博史・山田朗 雄山閣出版
0620 弁護士がみた戦後補償と人権 村山晃 部落問題研究所
0707 戦争と平和の事典-現代史を読むキーワード 松井愈・林茂夫・梅林宏道・渡辺賢二・吉池俊子・綿引光友・伊藤田直史 高文研
0720 日本の中国侵略と毒ガス兵器 歩平著、山辺悠喜子・宮崎教四郎(監訳) 明石書店
0815 在韓被爆者が語る被爆50年-求められる戦後補償 韓国の原爆被害者を救援する市民の会
1215 PEACE!PEACE!PEACE!わたしたちに戦争責任はないのか 日本戦没学生記念会(わだつみ会)編 情況出版
1996
0310 戦争責任Vol.4-特集:50年目の責任 アジアに対する日本の戦争責任を問う民衆法廷準備会編 樹花社
0328 日中戦争の悲劇―写真でつづる中国からの証言 馬振犢・陳仲丹・林慧敏(編著 )藤尾直正・藤尾玲子(訳)

 

柳原書店
0531 日本軍の細菌戦・毒ガス戦―日本の中国侵略と戦争犯罪 731部隊国際シンポジウム実行委員会編 明石書店
0801 在韓被爆者が語る被爆50年-求められる戦後補償<改訂版> 韓国の原爆被害者を救援する市民の会
0815 戦後世代の戦争責任 田口裕史 樹花舎(発行所)・星雲社(発売所)
1115 教科書から消せない戦争の真実―歴史を歪める藤岡信勝氏らへの批判 家永三郎(監修)吉見義明・藤原彰・安井三吉・大日方純夫(著) 教科書検定訴訟を支援する全国連絡会(発売:青木書店)
1997
0725 現代歴史学と戦争責任 吉田裕 青木書店
0801 南京の日本軍―南京大虐殺とその背景 藤原彰 大月書店
1009 南京の真実 ジョン・ラーベ著、エルヴィン・ヴィッケルト編、平野卿子訳 講談社
1998
0225 戦争責任-過去から未来へ アジアに対する戦争責任を問う民衆法廷準備会 緑風出版
0315 季刊戦争責任研究№19 日本の戦争責任資料センター
0323 裁かれた戦争犯罪―イギリスの滞日戦犯裁判 林博史 岩波書店
0615 季刊戦争責任研究 №20 日本の戦争責任資料センター
0731 戦争責任と核廃絶 岩松繁俊 三一書房
1999
0515 戦前の「水豊」から「安野」の今へ 西松建設の戦争責任 中国人強制連行・西松建設裁判を支援する会
0630 戦争責任と「われわれ」 「「歴史主体」論争」をめぐって 安彦一恵・魚住洋一・中岡成文編 ナカニシヤ出版
0731 731面積の系譜―細菌戦部隊と秘蔵のファイル 太田昌克 日本評論社
0901 戦後補償とは何か 朝日新聞戦後補償問題取材班 朝日文庫
1210 戦後責任論 高橋哲哉 講談社
2000
1105   天皇の戦争責任  加藤典洋・橋爪大三郎・竹田青嗣  径書房
2001
 0220 グローバリゼーションと戦争責任 金子勝 岩波書店
0805 日本の戦争責任をどう考えるか 歴史若いワークショップからの報告 船橋洋一編著 朝日新聞社
2004
0728 毒ガス戦と日本軍 吉見義明 岩波書店
2006
 0710  検証戦争責任Ⅰ  読売新聞戦争責任検証委員会編著  中央公論新社
1010 検証戦争責任Ⅱ 読売新聞戦争責任検証委員会編著  中央公論新社
 2006
0625 シンガポール華僑虐殺―日本軍はシンガポールで何をしたのか 林博史 高文研
2015
0901 アメリカの戦争責任 戦後最大のタブーに挑む 竹田恒泰 PHP研究所
2019
0520 検証「戦後民主主義」 わたしたちはなぜ戦争責任問題を解決できないのか 田中利幸 三一書房

Struve Geodetic Arc

Struve Geodetic Arc – UNESCO World Heritage Centre

Struve Geodetic Ar<作業中

he Struve Arc is a chain of survey triangulations stretching from Hammerfest in Norway to the Black Sea, through 10 countries and over 2,820 km. These are points of a survey, carried out between 1816 and 1855 by the astronomer Friedrich Georg Wilhelm Struve, which represented the first accurate measuring of a long segment of a meridian. This helped to establish the exact size and shape of the planet and marked an important step in the development of earth sciences and topographic mapping. It is an extraordinary example of scientific collaboration among scientists from different countries, and of collaboration between monarchs for a scientific cause. The original arc consisted of 258 main triangles with 265 main station points. The listed site includes 34 of the original station points, with different markings, i.e. a drilled hole in rock, iron cross, cairns, or built obelisks.

Outstanding Universal Value

Brief synthesis

The determination of the size and shape of the world was one of the most important problems of natural philosophy since at least the 4th century B.C. The development, in the 16th century, of a measurement system called “triangulation” improved the ability to determine the size and shape of the world. In this system, long chains of triangles were measured, creating arcs that stretched along hundreds and thousands of kilometres.

The Struve Geodetic Arc is a chain of survey triangulations stretching from Hammerfest in Norway to the Black Sea, through ten countries and over 2,820 km. These are points of a survey, carried out between 1816 and 1855 by several scientists (surveyors) under leadership of the astronomer Friedrich Georg Wilhelm Struve, which represented the first accurate measuring of a long segment of a meridian. This helped to establish the exact size and shape of our planet and marked an important step in the development of earth sciences and topographic mapping. It is an extraordinary example of the development of sciences and of collaboration among scientists from different countries, as well as monarchs, for a common scientific cause.

Prior to the Struve Geodetic Arc, an arc of about 2,400 km had been measured in India by Lambton and Everest (completed in 1845), and a shorter arc in Lithuania by Carl Tenner. Struve, who was working at the Dorpat University (currently University of Tartu in Estonia), decided that he would establish an arc following a line of longitude (meridian) passing through the observatory of the university. The new long arc, later to be known as the Struve Geodetic Arc, was eventually created by connecting earlier, shorter arcs to the southern one measured by Tenner, and their extension to the north and south. The arc thus covered a line connecting Fuglenæs, near Hammerfest at the Arctic Ocean, with Staro-Nekrassowka, near Ismail, on the Black Sea shores, along more than 2,800 km. The original arc consisted of 258 main triangles with 265 main station points. The inscribed property includes 34 of the original station points established by Struve and his colleagues between 1816 and 1851 – four points in Norway, four in Sweden, six in Finland, two in Russia, three in Estonia, two in Latvia, three in Lithuania, five in Belarus, one in Moldova and four in Ukraine. Other preserved sites of the Arc are protected nationally.

These marks take different forms: small holes drilled in rock surfaces, and sometimes filled with lead; cross-shaped engraved marks on rock surfaces; solid stone or brick with a marker inset; rock structures (cairns) with a central stone or brick marked by a drilled hole; individual bricks; as well as especially constructed ‘monuments’ to commemorate the point and the arc.

The Struve Geodetic Arc is an extraordinary example of the interchange of human values in the form of international scientific collaboration, as well as an outstanding example of a technological ensemble.

Criterion (ii): The first accurate measuring of a long segment of a meridian, helping in the establishment of the exact size and shape of the world exhibits an important step in the development of earth sciences. It is also an extraordinary example for interchange of human values in the form of scientific collaboration among scientists from different countries. It is at the same time an example for collaboration between monarchs of different powers, for a scientific cause.

Criterion (iv): The Struve Geodetic Arc is undoubtedly an outstanding example of a technological ensemble – presenting the triangulation points of the measuring of the meridian, being the non-movable and non-tangible part of the measuring technology.

Criterion (vi): The measuring of the arc and its results are directly associated with humans wondering about their world, its shape and size. It is linked with Sir Isaac Newton’s theory that the world is not an exact sphere.

Integrity

The inscribed property consists of 34 components, which in total comprise an area of 0.6 ha, with buffer zones amounting to a total of 11 ha. All components of the Struve Geodetic Arc are linked to one chain and a number of the Arc sites belong to national state geodetic reference networks that confer integrity even with the geodetic measurements processed today.

Authenticity

The inscribed components of the property have special characteristics and significance on a technological and scientific level. All points are maintained in their original location and changes are limited to some later constructions marking the locations.

Protection and management requirements

For the inscription of the Struve Geodetic Arc, the ten countries involved collaborated in locating and investigating the sites of historical measurements by using available geodetic observation data and by means of the recent measurement methods as well as satellite geodesy. Upon identification of the component parts, each State Party provided legal protection in accordance with its national frameworks, which in practice entails that some points are covered by laws protecting geodetic points and also by laws for the protection of cultural heritage.

At the national level, each State authority, usually the national mapping authority with the involvement of local administrative authorities, is responsible for the conservation and management of the Struve Geodetic Arc. At the international level, management is the responsibility of the Coordinating Committee, which meets every other year and is run according to management mechanisms agreed upon by all ten countries.

Based on the resolutions of the Coordinating Committee, national representative organizations actively promote the Struve Geodetic Arc via different tasks, such as the producing post stamps and envelopes (completed by Belarus, Estonia, Finland, Latvia, Lithuania, Moldova, Sweden, Ukraine); making promotional movies and educational leaflets, books and articles; preparing exhibitions; translating documentation; restoring geodetic instruments and other materials, and even minting commemorative coins for the Struve Geodetic Arc (Belarus, Moldova).

Ukraine: UNESCO statement 20220224

Ukraine: UNESCO statement 20220224<作成中

Ukraine: UNESCO statement following the adoption of the UN General Assembly resolution – UNESCO World Heritage Centre

UNPress release

ESCO’s statement on the recent developments in Ukraine

UNESCO

UNESCO is deeply concerned about the ongoing military operations and the escalation of violence in Ukraine. As stated by the UN Secretary-General, such operations are violations of the territorial integrity and sovereignty of Ukraine and are inconsistent with the Charter of the United Nations.

UNESCO calls for respect for international humanitarian law, notably the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its two (1954 and 1999) Protocols, to ensure the prevention of damage to cultural heritage in all its forms.

This also includes the obligations under the United Nations Security Council Resolution 2222 (2015) on the protection of journalists, media professionals and associated personnel in situations of conflict, to promote free, independent and impartial media as one of the essential foundations of a democratic society, and which can contribute to the protection of civilians.

UNESCO also calls for restraint from attacks on, or harm to, children, teachers, education personnel or schools, and for the right to education to be upheld.

over

 

Ukraine: UNESCO statement 20220303

Ukraine: UNESCO statement<作成中

Ukraine: UNESCO statement following the adoption of the UN General Assembly resolution – UNESCO World Heritage Centre

Following the adoption by the United Nations General Assembly of the Resolution on Aggression against Ukraine, and in light of the devastating escalation of violence, UNESCO is deeply concerned by developments in Ukraine and is working to assess damage across its spheres of competence (notably education, culture, heritage and information) and to implement emergency support actions.

The UNGA Resolution reaffirms the paramount importance of the UN Charter and commitment to the sovereignty, independence, unity, and territorial integrity of Ukraine within its internationally recognized borders, and it demands “that the Russian Federation immediately cease its use of force against Ukraine.”

The Director-General, Audrey Azoulay, fully concurs with the opening remarks made by the Secretary-General at the Special Session of the General Assembly, during which he said that “this escalating violence — which is resulting in civilian deaths, including children – is totally unacceptable.”

In addition, she calls for the “protection of Ukrainian cultural heritage, which bears witness to the country’s rich history, and includes its seven World Heritage sites – notably located in Lviv and Kyiv; the cities of Odessa and Kharkiv, members of the UNESCO Creative Cities Network; its national archives, some of which feature in the UNESCO Memory of the World Register; and its sites commemorating the tragedy of the Holocaust.”

“We must safeguard this cultural heritage, as a testimony of the past but also as a vector of peace for the future, which the international community has a duty to protect and preserve for future generations. It is also to protect the future that educational institutions must be considered sanctuaries.”

Consistent with its mandate, UNESCO demands the immediate cessation of attacks on civilian facilities, such as schools, universities, memorial sites, cultural and communication infrastructures, and deplores civilian casualties, including students, teachers, artists, scientists and journalists. These include women and children, girls especially, disproportionately impacted by the conflict and displacement.

In the field of education, Resolution 2601 adopted in 2021 by the UN Security Council states that UN Member States are to “prevent attacks and threats of attacks against schools and ensure the protection of schools and civilians connected with schools, including children and teachers during armed conflict as well as in post-conflict phases”. The General Assembly Resolution of 2 March expresses grave concern at reports of attacks on civilian facilities including schools. In this regard, UNESCO strongly condemns attacks against education facilities, with the damaging of at least seven institutions in the past week, including the attack on 2 March on Karazin Kharkiv National University.

The nationwide closure of schools and education facilities has affected the entire school-aged population — 6 million students between 3 and 17 years old, and more than 1.5 million enrolled in higher education institutions. The escalation of violence hampers the protective role of education, and the impact may be far-reaching including in neighbouring countries.

In the field of culture, UNESCO underlines the obligations of international humanitarian law, notably the 1954 Hague Convention for the Protection of Cultural Property in the Event of Armed Conflict and its two (1954 and 1999) Protocols, to refrain from inflicting damage to cultural property, and condemns all attacks and damage to cultural heritage in all its forms in Ukraine. UNESCO calls also for the full implementation of UN Security Council Resolution 2347.

In this respect, UNESCO is gravely concerned with the damages incurred by the city of Kharkiv, UNESCO Creative City for Music, and the historic centre of Chernihiv, on Ukraine’s World Heritage Tentative List. UNESCO deeply regrets reports of damage to the works of the celebrated Ukrainian artist, Maria Primachenko, with whose anniversary UNESCO was associated in 2009.

UNESCO condemns also the attack that affected the Babyn Yar Holocaust memorial, the site of one of the largest mass shootings of Jews during World War II, and calls for the respect of historic sites, whose value for education and remembrance is irreplaceable.

In order to prevent attacks, UNESCO, in close coordination with the Ukrainian authorities, is working to mark as quickly as possible key historic monuments and sites across Ukraine with the distinctive emblem of the 1954 Hague Convention, an internationally recognised signal for the protection of cultural heritage in the event of armed conflict.  In addition, UNESCO has approached the Ukrainian authorities with a view to organising a meeting with museum directors across the country to help them respond to urgent needs for safeguarding museum collections and cultural property. In cooperation with UNITAR/UNOSAT, UNESCO will be monitoring the damages incurred by cultural sites through satellite imagery analysis.

In the field of access to information and freedom of expression, UNESCO recalls its previous statement underlining obligations under UN Security Council Resolution 2222 to protect media professionals and associated personnel. It further notes, as in the same resolution, “media equipment and installations constitute civilian objects, and in this respect shall not be the object of attack or of reprisals, unless they are military objectives”.

In this respect, UNESCO is deeply concerned about reports of the targeting of media infrastructure, including the shelling of Kyiv’s main television tower on 1 March 2022, with multiple reported fatalities, including at least one media worker, as well as cases of violence against journalists and attempts to restrict access to the Internet.

In a conflict situation, free and independent media are critical for ensuring civilians have access to potentially life-saving information and debunking disinformation and rumours.

At the request of a group of Member States, the UNESCO Executive Board will hold a Special Session on 15 March “to examine the impact and consequences of the current situation in Ukraine in all aspects of UNESCO’s mandate”.

over

ウクライナの世界遺産

ウクライナの世界遺産<作業中

No. 登録年 遺産名 種別 備考
1 1990 キエフ-ペチェールスカヤ大修道院  文化遺産 / (i)(ii)(iii)(iv)
2 1998 リヴィウ歴史地区(1998年)  文化遺産 /(ii)(v)
3 2005 シュトゥルーヴェの三角点アーチ観測地点群  文化遺産/(ii)(iv)(vi)
4 2007 カルパチア山脈とヨーロッパ地域の古代及び原生ブナ林  自然遺産 / (ix)
  2007、2011, 2017
5 2011 ブコヴィナ・ダルマティアの主教座施設  文化遺産 / (ii)(iii)(iv)
6 2013 古代都市「タウリカのヘルソネソス」とそのホーラ  文化遺産 / (ii)(v)
7 2013 ポーランド、ウクライナのカルパチア地方の木造教会  文化遺産 / (iii)(iv)

京大闘争 京大神話の崩壊

『京大闘争 京大神話の崩壊』(京大新聞社編・京大全共闘協力、三一書房、19690615)

005
1933年 京大事件
1943年 学徒出陣
1945年 敗戦―大学再建
1951年 天皇事件
1955年 大学自治の後退―第2次京大事件
1960年 安保闘争
111
1967年 10・8羽田闘争
山崎博昭「日記」
 大江健三郎「山崎君の日記を読んで」(文芸春秋社「持続する志」より引用)
1969年
120 第1部 京大闘争’69
292 第2部 原点からの問いかけ
338 第3部 「京大の屍」をこえて
「大学問題をめぐって」ティーチイン(大学変革委員会 講師:高橋和巳)
351 学生H:僕は4回生ですが、今現実的に卒業や大学院入試がせまっていて、どうしようか迷っています。現実の問題として入試中止といった事態も起こりかねない時に、先生や闘争を組んでいる諸君は一体どんな展望を持っているのか。卒業や入試をひかえた者のことも考えてほしい。
406 京大闘争すくらっぷ
416 付表 京大闘争の日誌